[Smt-talk] Classical Form and Recursion

Murphy, Scott Brandon smurphy at ku.edu
Wed Mar 25 09:09:25 PDT 2009


Rick Cohn does this sort of thing in ³Dramatization...² 19thCM 15/3 (1992).

Scott

-- 
Scott Murphy
Associate Professor, Music Theory
University of Kansas
smurphy at ku.edu


on 3/25/09 9:20 AM, Dmitri Tymoczko at dmitri at Princeton.EDU wrote:
> 
> It is typically possible to interpret a sequence of symbols recursively.  For
> instance, we could take the sequence
> 
> ABABABABAB...
> 
> And group it as follows:
> 
> (ABA)(BAB)(ABA)(BAB) ...
> 
> Then, by asserting that (ABA) "stands for" (or "represents" or "prolongs") A,
> while (BAB) "represents" B, we could come up with a "higher level" version of
> the same pattern
> 
> ABABABAB ...
> 
> (Here each symbol stands for 3 symbols in our original.)  We might take this
> to demonstrate that there is recursive structure in our sequence.  It is even
> possible that this sort of procedure could represent a psychologically
> accurate description of the way some particular person perceives or organizes
> the sequence.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.societymusictheory.org/pipermail/smt-talk-societymusictheory.org/attachments/20090325/f76fa5ed/attachment-0004.htm>


More information about the Smt-talk mailing list