[Smt-talk] Subdominant
Olli Väisälä
ovaisala at siba.fi
Thu May 17 11:56:23 PDT 2012
Some further thoughts on the opening of Carnaval:
Frank Samarotto's and Eytan Agmon's discussion raises interesting
questions about the criteria of determination of structural weight in
Schenkerian analysis, an issue that I have pondered a lot in recent
years.
A crucial criterion, on which most of us would probably agree, is
that in a passage of unified design, based on the repetition of a
pattern, the framing points should be strongly preferred as the two
elements with the greatest structural weight. In the Schumann, mm. 3–
6 form such a passage, especially on the basis of the sequential
right-hand part. Consequently, the IV and the V at the endpoints of
this passage are structurally superior to the intervening chords, as
both Frank and Eytan (and myself) agree.
I would suggest, however, that the criteria for determining the next
most significant element are more complex. Two principles seem to
compete here, which might be called "partition principle" and "penult
principle". Under partition principle, the elements that occur at the
points that subdivide the passage take precedence. This principle
would support Eytan's reading of the "I" in m. 5 as overriding the
subsequent V4/3 of V. Under penult principle, the next-to-last
element tends to take precedence. This principle supports, of course,
Frank's reading of a voice-exchange between the IV and the V4/3 of V.
My analytical experience suggests that it is by no means simple to
decide which of these two principles is more powerful in each case.
Sometimes the penult has to be chosen simply because it is
indispensable for the Schenkerian syntax. But the question can also
be approached from an empirical viewpoint: are there some particular
compositonal features – for example, registral or gestural – that
might reflect the structural signficance of either the partition
points or the penult?
In the present case both the "I" and the V4/3 of V are syntactically
possible. As an empirical argument, one might note that the V4/3 of V
is registrally underlined by the bass's leap, which deviates from the
preceding motion. Hence, this aspect would support Frank's reading of
voice exchange (on which I am also intuitively inclined to agree).
The dilemma between the partition principle and penult principle has,
of couse, much larger implications for Schenkerian studies, and is
one of the several evidential questions of Schenkerianism that would
be in need of better illumination.
Olli Väisälä
Sibelius Academy
ovaisala at siba.fi
More information about the Smt-talk
mailing list