[Smt-talk] Pop Music And Theory

[Isaac Malitz]

There is plenty of method/structure/model to be found in pop music.

However, the grain of truth (more than a grain really) in Carson's 
comment is that pop music in recent decades has evolved with freedom and 
many wonderful innovations.


Isaac Malitz
imalitz at OMSModel.com
www.OMSModel.com
818-231-3965


On 12/11/2014 8:29 AM, Victor grauer wrote:
> --------------------------------------------
> On Wed, 12/10/14, CARSON FARLEY wrote:
>
> "The essence of Pop music is that it is free of all rules and not concerned with structure in the same way that classical music/art is."
>
>   I completely disagree. According to my research, pop music is in fact highly constrained. As you say, the musicians themselves are usually not consciously aware of the constraints -- but the same could be said for many "classical" composers as well. Certain fundamental structural and stylistic elements have been passed on as taken-for-granted traditions. But that does not make popular music free of all rules, not at all.
>
> For some insights into how pop music operates within very rigid constraints dating, very possibly, from the 16th century, see my book "The Life and Times of a Musical Virus: A Critical History of the Rhythm Section" --
>   http://www.amazon.com/Life-Times-Musical-Virus-Critical-ebook/dp/B00LH0GKJC
>
> Victor Grauer
> Pittsburgh, PA
> USA
>
> _______________________________________________
> Smt-talk mailing list
> Smt-talk at lists.societymusictheory.org
> http://lists.societymusictheory.org/listinfo.cgi/smt-talk-societymusictheory.org
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4794 / Virus Database: 4235/8719 - Release Date: 12/11/14
>
>