<html><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">
<div>Building on Sarah Fuller's suggestion, how about "formal unit?"</div><div><br></div><div>Greg Karl</div><div>Jay NY</div><div><br></div><br><div><div>On May 29, 2012, at 5:03 PM, <a href="mailto:sfuller@notes.cc.sunysb.edu">sfuller@notes.cc.sunysb.edu</a> wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite"><font size="2" face="sans-serif">Regarding "</font><tt><font size="2">Thanks, everyone, for the suggestions. Many of them were good and<br> generic: component, section, division, piece, work-section. However, I<br> think it's quite important to have a more specific term here to avoid<br> overlap with other concepts and to make the intended meaning clear."</font></tt> <br> <br><font size="2" face="sans-serif">But of course any term covering that number of diverse kinds of elements is going to be generic.</font> <br><font size="2" face="sans-serif">For all sorts of reasons, I don't think "Satz" works. What about "unit"? Movements, discrete sections,</font> <br><font size="2" face="sans-serif">acts, and numbers are all types of unit. </font> <br> <br><font size="2" face="sans-serif">Sarah Fuller</font> <br><font size="2" face="sans-serif">Stony Brook University </font> <br><font size="2" face="sans-serif"><br> <br></font></blockquote></div><br></body></html>