<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Frank et al -- There's some nuance to
      be added here.  Dan's text (p. 309) states that "First, he [ Erpf]
      remakes harmonic function from a three-termed into a two-termed
      dualism--in other words, from a conception of a central T and two
      lateral areas, S and D, to one involving an 'on' Tonic state and
      an 'off' non-Tonic state.  Although both traditional Subdominant
      and Dominant categories are retained, they are now the two basic
      aspects of the non-Tonic state . . . "   Dan goes on to show
      Erpf's indications for the "off" state differentiate S from D and
      major from minor, and that Erpf's examples show elements of "both
      Dominants" ("Doppeldominanten") within chords, such as a "V11"
      chord combining a bottom D and upper S:  G-B-D-F-A-C.  <br>
      <br>
      Dave Headlam<br>
      <br>
      On 8/28/13 8:02 PM, Frank Samarotto wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote cite="mid:CE4407C9.2A2F0%25fsamarot@indiana.edu"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=ISO-8859-1">
      <title>Re: [Smt-talk] Caution versus Generalization</title>
      <font face="Garamond"><span style="font-size:12pt">Nicholas, <br>
          <br>
          I rely here on Harrison’s excellent survey of Riemann’s
          followers: Did not Hermann Erpf simplify Riemann’s functions
          down to just two: T or D?<br>
          <br>
          Not quite a household name, but perhaps shows the dangers of
          reductionist theories like Riemann’s. (Insert emoticon here.)<br>
          <br>
          Best, <br>
          Frank<br>
          <br>
          <br>
          Frank Samarotto<br>
          Associate Professor of Music Theory<br>
          Jacobs School of Music<br>
          Indiana University Bloomington<br>
          <br>
          <br>
          <br>
          <br>
          On 8/28/13 4:25 PM, "Nicolas Meeùs" <<a
            moz-do-not-send="true" href="nicolas.meeus@scarlet.be">nicolas.meeus@scarlet.be</a>>
          wrote:<br>
          <br>
        </span></font>
      <blockquote><font face="Garamond"><span style="font-size:12pt">  </span></font><span
          style="font-size:12pt"><font face="Calibri, Verdana,
            Helvetica, Arial">Dimitar,<br>
             <br>
             I fail to imagine ANY theory of harmony having "repudiated"
            the subdominant function. If this once again is an attack
            against Schenker, let me repeat that you are very much
            mistaken, that there is nothing of the kind to be found in
            any of Schenker's writings. If you are thinking of some
            other theory, I'd be very interested to know.<br>
             <br>
             Nicolas Meeùs<br>
             Université Paris-Sorbonne<br>
             <br>
             <br>
             <br>
             </font><font face="Garamond"> <br>
            Le 28/08/2013 01:23, Ninov, Dimitar N a écrit :<br>
             <br>
             <br>
          </font></span>
        <blockquote><span style="font-size:12pt"><font face="Garamond">
              <br>
              All in all, I think that the repudiation of the
              subdominant function ...<br>
               <br>
            </font></span></blockquote>
        <span style="font-size:12pt"><font face="Garamond"> <br>
             <br>
            <hr align="CENTER" size="3" width="95%"></font></span><font
          size="1"><font face="Monaco, Courier New"><span
              style="font-size:9pt">_______________________________________________<br>
              Smt-talk mailing list<br>
              <a moz-do-not-send="true"
                href="Smt-talk@lists.societymusictheory.org">Smt-talk@lists.societymusictheory.org</a><br>
              <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://lists.societymusictheory.org/listinfo.cgi/smt-talk-societymusictheory.org">http://lists.societymusictheory.org/listinfo.cgi/smt-talk-societymusictheory.org</a><br>
            </span></font></font></blockquote>
      <br>
      <fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre wrap="">_______________________________________________
Smt-talk mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:Smt-talk@lists.societymusictheory.org">Smt-talk@lists.societymusictheory.org</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.societymusictheory.org/listinfo.cgi/smt-talk-societymusictheory.org">http://lists.societymusictheory.org/listinfo.cgi/smt-talk-societymusictheory.org</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
    <br>
    <pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">-- 
Dave Headlam
Professor of Music Theory
Eastman School of Music
26 Gibbs St.
Rochester, NY 14604
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:david.headlam@rochester.edu">david.headlam@rochester.edu</a>

<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://theory.esm.rochester.edu/dave_headlam">http://theory.esm.rochester.edu/dave_headlam</a></pre>
  </body>
</html>