[Smt-talk] Gender Terminology in Music Theory
Jennifer Bain
Jennifer.Bain at Dal.Ca
Tue Apr 29 11:56:23 PDT 2014
So to refer to a cadence that ends on a strong metric position as
masculine and one that ends on a weak metric position as feminine is not
sexist...? Didn't we sort this out in 1991?
Jennifer
Jennifer Bain, Ph.D.
Chair, Dept. of Music
bainj at dal.ca
902-494-1142
Dalhousie University
6101 University Avenue
Halifax, NS, B3H 4R2
On 14-04-29 11:49 AM, "Ninov, Dimitar N" <dn16 at txstate.edu> wrote:
>Dear Colleagues,
>
>Also, one must not forget the traditional terms "masculine cadence" and
>"feminine cadence" as referred to the metric position of the final tonic.
>This, of course, is not sexist language, although I do not rule out some
>future "original contribution" referring to a third gender cadence, which
>is neither masculine, nor feminine (ha-ha).
>
>Best regards,
>
>Dimitar
>
>Dr. Dimitar Ninov, Lecturer
>School of Music
>Texas State University
>601 University Drive
>San Marcos, Texas 78666
>_______________________________________________
>Smt-talk mailing list
>Smt-talk at lists.societymusictheory.org
>http://lists.societymusictheory.org/listinfo.cgi/smt-talk-societymusictheo
>ry.org
More information about the Smt-talk
mailing list