[Smt-talk] Seeking deceptively resolving applied dominants.
David K Feurzeig
mozojo at gmail.com
Sun Jan 24 15:52:05 PST 2010
On Jan 24, 2010, at 7:57 AM, karst de jong wrote:
> I think that Rameau already considered the iii in the progression
> iii-IV a I7 with a non-sounding fundament, thus closely resembling a
> I-IV progression. Consequently V/vi could be regarded as an altered
> version of this chord (I7/9 augmented without its fundament).
This interpretation is nicely suggestive for "Imagine":
The verse begins with the progression
bar 1: I maj7
bar 2: IV
While the relevant passage in the chorus runs:
bar 2: I III7 (or V7/vi)
bar 3: IV
This approximate parallel between the verse and chorus suggests
exactly the correspondence Rameau claims.
Though personally I suspect Rameau's missing-fundamentals hypothesis
is superfluous--that is, that the musical "data" are just as well-
accounted for as a matter of common triadic subsets, without appeal to
imaginary notes. E.g. Cmaj7 shares a triad with Em7, etc., so it's no
great wonder they share tendencies.
David Feurzeig
University of Vermont
More information about the Smt-talk
mailing list