[Smt-talk] quick query

Mark.AnsonCartwright at qc.cuny.edu Mark.AnsonCartwright at qc.cuny.edu
Thu Feb 14 07:11:52 PST 2013


Dear readers of the list,

In fairness to Joel Lester -- his article, which I cited earlier today in response to Michael-- acknowledges Burmeister's 1606 analysis of Lassus.
One of his points is that the analyses we do find in 17th and early 18th centuries were conducted for special reasons -- e.g. to illustrate rhetorical devices. Analyses are not yet done simply to demonstrate the excellence of a particular piece.

One thing, then, to consider in answering the question about the earliest known analysis of a piece of music is: what motivated the analysis in the first place? What does the author of the analysis mean by that term(if indeed he or she used it)?

Mark Anson-Cartwright
CUNY

On Feb 14, 2013, at 8:02 AM, "Michael Morse" <mwmorse at bell.net> wrote:

> Dear Colleagues,
> 
>   Is there any consensus on what counts as the first piece of music analysis? What are the contenders?
> 
> Thnks,
> 
> Michael Morse
> Cultural Studies
> Trent University 
> Peterborough, Oshawa
> _______________________________________________
> Smt-talk mailing list
> Smt-talk at lists.societymusictheory.org
> http://lists.societymusictheory.org/listinfo.cgi/smt-talk-societymusictheory.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.societymusictheory.org/pipermail/smt-talk-societymusictheory.org/attachments/20130214/70a7eebc/attachment-0003.htm>


More information about the Smt-talk mailing list