[Smt-talk] "Neighboring" 6/4 Chords
Ciro Scotto
ciro.scotto7 at gmail.com
Wed Oct 5 09:37:06 PDT 2011
Hello Everyone,
I tend to think and explain to my class that the V6/4 in the context of being an upper neighbor to ^1 sounds too much like a cadential 6/4 (even if the V6/4 is in the wrong rhythmic position) implying a move to the dominant, as Charles Ditto suggested. As soon as I play the V6/4, I hear the cadential function, and ^2 looses its upper neighbor function and becomes a point of arrival. Of course, this does not happen with V4/3 because the tritone reinforces the embellishing function of ^2. The stepwise bass approach to the V6/4 I think reinforces hearing a cadential function for the V6/4.
All the best,
Ciro
On Oct 2, 2011, at 6:20 PM, Ditto, Charles wrote:
> Greetings, Collective,
>
> I wonder about the number of occurrences of harmonizing the 1-2-1 in the bass with I(i) - V6/4(ii dim or ii half-dim7) - V4/2 of V(v) there might be in the tonal literature. It could be a smooth modulation to the dominant. Anybody know an example of that?
>
> Charles Ditto
> School of Music
> Texas State University
> ________________________________________
> From: smt-talk-bounces at lists.societymusictheory.org [smt-talk-bounces at lists.societymusictheory.org] On Behalf Of gzar at mail2.gis.net [gzar at mail2.gis.net]
> Sent: Sunday, October 02, 2011 12:48 PM
> To: Matt Bribitzer-Stull
> Cc: Society for Music Theory
> Subject: Re: [Smt-talk] "Neighboring" 6/4 Chords
>
> Dear Matt and All,
>
> In the haste of my previous reply I also seem to have assumed that
> the bass of the 6/4-chord could as well be (and maybe better ought to
> be) part of a PT-figure, rather than just a NT-figure. I think the
> comments I made still apply, one way or another, but let me add that
> in the case of a truly "upper-NT-bass" on ^2, the "direction" of the
> resultant figure probably would be to aim the initial prolonged Tonic
> toward a deeper N/P-chord, as part of a longer, turn-like Initial
> Ascent (quasi-Schleifer) -- rather than as a P-figure immediately
> aiming towards "S"-function, as I proposed in the previous posting.
>
> Here is an example of the actual "NT-^2" ("^ - - " indicates the
> smaller prolongation, "^^ --^ --^ " the larger):
>
> ^^1/5/3/1-2/5/4/7-1/5/3/1--^7/5/2/2--^1/5/1/3 (-- ^^4/6/1/2
> --^^5/5/7/2--^^1/5/1/3)
> [not great spacing -- sorry!]
>
> Sincerely,
>
> Gerry
>
> Gerald Zaritzky
> Faculty, Department of Music Theory
> New England Conservatory of Music
> 290 Huntington Avenue (Room JH 325)
> Boston, Massachusetts 02115 USA
> gerald.zaritzky at necmusic.edu
> office: 617-585-1373 (voicemail only)
>
> At 10:38 AM -0500 9/29/11, Matt Bribitzer-Stull wrote:
>> Dear Colleagues:
>>
>> I find when instructing undergraduates in core harmony courses that
>> students accept the guidelines we provide for part-writing much
>> better if they understand the reasoning behind them. I'm at a loss,
>> however, to explain why common-practice composers rarely used a 6/4
>> chord above scale degree 2 as a bass neighbor motion expanding
>> tonic. V4/3 is most often a passing bass gesture (in which, of
>> course, there's a good reason why students need not resolve the
>> chordal seventh in the soprano - namely, it's not a dissonance with
>> the bass and often completes a pleasing parallel-tenths idiom) or
>> part of a collection of dominant-functioned chords, though it can
>> and does function as a bass neighbor expanding tonic; and vii 6 an
>> vii 6/5 harmonize bass neighbor notes with much more frequency than
>> a 6/4 chord.
>>
>> I'd be interested if there are any compelling contrapuntal or
>> harmonic reasons why composers tended not to harmonize neighbor
>> motions in the bass with unaccented 6/4 chords.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Matt
>>
>> --
>> ________________________________
>>
>> Matthew Bribitzer-Stull
>> Associate Professor of Music Theory
>> University of Minnesota School of Music
>>
>> *** Emails sent from this account are often personal in nature.
>> Whether personal or professional, emails sent from this account do
>> not necessarily reflect the views of the University of Minnesota or
>> members of the University community. ***
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Smt-talk mailing list
>> Smt-talk at lists.societymusictheory.org
>> http://lists.societymusictheory.org/listinfo.cgi/smt-talk-societymusictheory.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Smt-talk mailing list
> Smt-talk at lists.societymusictheory.org
> http://lists.societymusictheory.org/listinfo.cgi/smt-talk-societymusictheory.org
> _______________________________________________
> Smt-talk mailing list
> Smt-talk at lists.societymusictheory.org
> http://lists.societymusictheory.org/listinfo.cgi/smt-talk-societymusictheory.org
Dr. Ciro G. Scotto
Assistant Professor of Theory
University of South Florida
home: (813) 443-6801
e-mail:
cscotto1 at usf.edu
cscotto at tampabay.rr.com
More information about the Smt-talk
mailing list