[Smt-talk] Subdominant versus Predominant
Nicolas Meeùs
nicolas.meeus at paris-sorbonne.fr
Sat Feb 25 00:35:06 PST 2012
Dimitar,
If you have all the answers to all your questions, I do not see why you
ask them, nor what you expect from us all.
As I tried to show in my preceding message, Rousseau was unclear as to
the meaning of subdominant, and wrote: "I may be mistaken in the
acception of these two words, not having under the eyes the writings of
Rameau as I write this article. He may understand by subdominant simply
the note that is one degree under the dominant." I added that it was not
Rameau who first gave the name, but probably Dandrieu, and that Dandrieu
most probably understood the word as meaning "the degree under the
dominant". This is how the term is understood in French today. See my
article "Scale, polifonia, armonia" in J. J. Nattiez ed., /Enciclopedia
della musica/, vol. II, /Il sapere musicale/,//Einaudi, 2002, p. 84,
which is precisely about that question of the difference of conception
between German and Roman languages.
Nicolas Meeùs
Université Paris-Sorbonne
Le 25/02/2012 00:22, Ninov, Dimitar N a écrit :
> [...]
>
> Since I-IV is acoustically and functionally more impressive than IV-V in a I-IV-V-I progression, the question "What follows the tonic?" is more relevant in identifying the harmonic function of IV than the question "What precedes the dominant?" The former question is an equivalent to a more important question, namely "How do we leave the state of stability?". On the other hand, "What precedes the dominant?" is an equivalent of the question "What is the lower degree of instability?" which does not seem as important.
>
> According the the logic explained above, the arrangement T-S-D-T makes perfect sense, but T-PD-D-T does not, for it answers the question "What is the lower state of instability?" instead of answering "How do we leave the state of stability?". This argument, paired with the fact that harmonic functions refer to the tonal center, in my view renders the label "PD" both superfluous and superficial.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Dimitar
>
> Dr. Dimitar Ninov
> Texas State University
> dn16 at txstate.edu
>
> ________________________________________
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.societymusictheory.org/pipermail/smt-talk-societymusictheory.org/attachments/20120225/d9f74dc9/attachment-0004.htm>
More information about the Smt-talk
mailing list