[Smt-talk] Caution versus Generalization

[Frank Samarotto]

Nicholas, 

I rely here on Harrison¹s excellent survey of Riemann¹s followers: Did not
Hermann Erpf simplify Riemann¹s functions down to just two: T or D?

Not quite a household name, but perhaps shows the dangers of reductionist
theories like Riemann¹s. (Insert emoticon here.)

Best, 
Frank


Frank Samarotto
Associate Professor of Music Theory
Jacobs School of Music
Indiana University Bloomington




On 8/28/13 4:25 PM, "Nicolas Meeùs" <nicolas.meeus at scarlet.be> wrote:

>   Dimitar,
>  
>  I fail to imagine ANY theory of harmony having "repudiated" the subdominant
> function. If this once again is an attack against Schenker, let me repeat that
> you are very much mistaken, that there is nothing of the kind to be found in
> any of Schenker's writings. If you are thinking of some other theory, I'd be
> very interested to know.
>  
>  Nicolas Meeùs
>  Université Paris-Sorbonne
>  
>  
>  
>   
> Le 28/08/2013 01:23, Ninov, Dimitar N a écrit :
>  
>  
>>  
>> All in all, I think that the repudiation of the subdominant function ...
>>  
>  
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Smt-talk mailing list
> Smt-talk at lists.societymusictheory.org
> http://lists.societymusictheory.org/listinfo.cgi/smt-talk-societymusictheory.o
> rg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.societymusictheory.org/pipermail/smt-talk-societymusictheory.org/attachments/20130828/1ec4ac83/attachment-0004.htm>