[Smt-talk] Fwd: First Species Question
Eytan Agmon
agmonz at 012.net.il
Wed Jul 7 09:12:01 PDT 2010
Dear all,
My reference to timbre in the previous post with regard to Jonathan's
Dichterliebe example is obviously incorrect. My apologies.
Eytan Agmon
Bar-Ilan University
From: smt-talk-bounces at societymusictheory.org
[mailto:smt-talk-bounces at societymusictheory.org] On Behalf Of Dunsby,
Jonathan
Sent: Wednesday, July 07, 2010 5:16 PM
To: smt-talk at societymusictheory.org
Subject: Re: [Smt-talk] Fwd: First Species Question
...fifths are (and sound like) fifths, no matter what registers...
Best regards,
Donna Doyle
Aaron Copland School of Music
Queens College
65-30 Kissena Blvd.
Flushing, NY 11367
Well you say that, but almost as another thread I'm wondering just how and
where, from a theory-building point of view, the illusion of 'part'
integrity kicks in or doesn't? When e.g. a voice actually dips under the
piano bass line in a 19C Lied, how come we don't hear it as the 'bass'
(shades of Dichterliebe No. 2, of course, beloved of us theorists, but such
happens all over Western art music, here and there)? My teacher always said
"because that's what Messiaen taught us". But is there a history-of-theory
etiology to this issue or perhaps non-issue? (Obviously, fifths with the
'bass' and fifths entailing only inner parts are not, in general, the same
thing....)
Jonathan
______________
Jonathan Dunsby
Chair, Music Theory Department
Professor of Music Theory
Eastman School of Music
http://www.ithaca.edu/music/mtsnys/officers.html
<https://webmail.ur.rochester.edu/exchweb/bin/redir.asp?URL=http://www.ithac
a.edu/music/mtsnys/officers.html>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.societymusictheory.org/pipermail/smt-talk-societymusictheory.org/attachments/20100707/eb508187/attachment-0004.htm>
More information about the Smt-talk
mailing list